Improved:Replaced the ecomstore to productStore at app level(#375) #797
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @SuyashSingh01, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on improving code consistency and readability by refactoring variable names across the application. Specifically, it renames instances of 'ecomstore' related variables to 'productStore' to align with existing terminology and reduce potential confusion. This is a purely refactoring change that does not alter the functional behavior of the application but enhances its maintainability and clarity. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors variable names from ecomstore to productStore for better consistency, which improves code clarity. The changes in src/store/modules/user/actions.ts are correct and align with this goal. In src/utils/index.ts, I've suggested an improvement to make the getProductStoreId function more robust by adding a null check to prevent potential runtime errors.
| const currentProductStore: any = useUserStore().getCurrentEComStore; | ||
| return currentProductStore.productStoreId |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While renaming the variable is a good improvement for consistency, this function can be made more robust. The current implementation will throw a TypeError if useUserStore().getCurrentEComStore returns a nullish value, which can be hard to debug. It's better to handle this case explicitly by checking for the value and throwing a more descriptive error. Additionally, the explicit any type can be removed to rely on type inference, improving type safety.
const currentProductStore = useUserStore().getCurrentEComStore;
if (!currentProductStore?.productStoreId) {
throw new Error("Current product store not found or is missing a productStoreId.");
}
return currentProductStore.productStoreId;1 participant
Related Issues
Issue:dxp-component/375
Issue Link; hotwax/dxp-components#375
Improved:Replaced the Ecomstore to ProductStore at app level.
Short Description and Why It's Useful
Screenshots of Visual Changes before/after (If There Are Any)
Contribution and Currently Important Rules Acceptance